An interesting article in “Parenting Aces” blog on how we ended up with the current rating system and National tournament system. Here are some excerpts:
Thirty years ago Nationally titled play was limited to the 4 National Championships. The Easter Bowl was a fifth event that had the prestige of a National Championship without the restrictions imposed on national events by USTA.
The reason that there were only 4 Nationally titled events (Indoors, Clay Courts, Hard Courts, and The Nationals) was that there were no limits on results that could be counted for National ranking. Any USTA sanctioned tournament match, regardless of location, could be submitted as part of a player’s record. There was a National circuit which included major open events like the Florida Open, Midwest Open, Texas Open, etc., but since all matches counted for National ranking, there was no need to designate them as “national”.
One major problem arose: as the USTA moved to computer-generated rankings, it became obvious that capturing all tournament results for inclusion in rankings was a Herculean task for the Junior Competition staff, so what could be done?
Junior Competition decided that there needed to be hierarchy of tournaments, and only results from events near the top of the food chain should be included in “National” rankings.
Read the whole story – HERE